<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Newsmakers of the Year?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://amomandherblog.com/newsmakers-of-the-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://amomandherblog.com/newsmakers-of-the-year/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 02:19:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristen</title>
		<link>http://amomandherblog.com/newsmakers-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-18226</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amomandherblog.com/?p=427#comment-18226</guid>
		<description>I am sorry, but when this happened, even at the age of 22 I went and created a living will. Do you know why? Because I do not want my husband to go through the same thing. If there are brain scans proving that I have no brain activity (which by the way, there were), I would not want to be kept alive. If I have little to no brain activity and my brain looked the way Terri&#039;s did, i would not want to be artificially nourished. There would be no point. 
But everyone can just go on believing what they want. Me? I&#039;ll just look at the facts and won&#039;t judge others. Hmmm I wonder if that means I have no morals? Sorry for the sarcasm, but this kind of thing really irritates me to no end.

&quot;who are you to judge the life I live? i know im not perfect - and i don&#039;t live to be. but before you start pointing fingers..make sure your hands are clean.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sorry, but when this happened, even at the age of 22 I went and created a living will. Do you know why? Because I do not want my husband to go through the same thing. If there are brain scans proving that I have no brain activity (which by the way, there were), I would not want to be kept alive. If I have little to no brain activity and my brain looked the way Terri&#8217;s did, i would not want to be artificially nourished. There would be no point.<br />
But everyone can just go on believing what they want. Me? I&#8217;ll just look at the facts and won&#8217;t judge others. Hmmm I wonder if that means I have no morals? Sorry for the sarcasm, but this kind of thing really irritates me to no end.</p>
<p>&#8220;who are you to judge the life I live? i know im not perfect &#8211; and i don&#8217;t live to be. but before you start pointing fingers..make sure your hands are clean.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirsten</title>
		<link>http://amomandherblog.com/newsmakers-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-2556</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirsten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 00:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amomandherblog.com/?p=427#comment-2556</guid>
		<description>I do not Michael Schiavo. He gives me th creeps. I question his motives. How can anyone not question his motives. He moved on with his life long ago. It wouldn&#039;t have made a difference in his life if Terri was taken care by her parents. Did he want the insurance money. I read there was insurance money. Now he wants to write a book! 

I still have a problem with his history of demanding behavior and unwillingness to let Terri&#039;s family be involved in many ways and at various times while she was still alive and in the hospital. 

If Mr. Schiavo feels vilified it&#039;s because he brought attention to himself and his family. He doesn&#039;t care about what this might have done to his family or he would have backed down long ago. He kept this in the news and now he has to keep up his sad story to help sell his book. I hope his new family (that he started well before any of this while still married to Terri) is proud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not Michael Schiavo. He gives me th creeps. I question his motives. How can anyone not question his motives. He moved on with his life long ago. It wouldn&#8217;t have made a difference in his life if Terri was taken care by her parents. Did he want the insurance money. I read there was insurance money. Now he wants to write a book! </p>
<p>I still have a problem with his history of demanding behavior and unwillingness to let Terri&#8217;s family be involved in many ways and at various times while she was still alive and in the hospital. </p>
<p>If Mr. Schiavo feels vilified it&#8217;s because he brought attention to himself and his family. He doesn&#8217;t care about what this might have done to his family or he would have backed down long ago. He kept this in the news and now he has to keep up his sad story to help sell his book. I hope his new family (that he started well before any of this while still married to Terri) is proud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://amomandherblog.com/newsmakers-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-2542</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 04:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amomandherblog.com/?p=427#comment-2542</guid>
		<description>I agree that starving someone to death - actually she dehydrated to death - no water or food until she died - was absolutely inhumane!  People would be jailed for doing the same to a pet or a prisoner.  Yet they did it to Terri because she was unable to protect herself and because she was a hindrance to her husband.  He had already started another relationship and had children by another woman.  I don&#039;t see why he was so determined to see Terri die.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that starving someone to death &#8211; actually she dehydrated to death &#8211; no water or food until she died &#8211; was absolutely inhumane!  People would be jailed for doing the same to a pet or a prisoner.  Yet they did it to Terri because she was unable to protect herself and because she was a hindrance to her husband.  He had already started another relationship and had children by another woman.  I don&#8217;t see why he was so determined to see Terri die.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob DeMoss</title>
		<link>http://amomandherblog.com/newsmakers-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-2541</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob DeMoss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 03:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amomandherblog.com/?p=427#comment-2541</guid>
		<description>Nobody expects PEOPLE to be offering &quot;fair and balanced&quot; articles. Nor do we expect them to write above a third-grade level. Even so, I was equally stunned to see a giant two-page spread featuring the freshly quaffed Michael Schiavo SITTING against Terri&#039;s headstone (didn&#039;t ANYBODY teach the man that it is irreverent to sit, stand, walk, jump, or sleep on a headstone?) followed by a brief &quot;article.&quot; The caption for this section said:

&quot;NEWSMAKERS OF THE YEAR: Unthinkable disasters, astonishing revelations, and remarkable human spirit. Here are the people who made 2005 memorable.&quot;

I guess you could argue that Michael Schiavo falls into the category of &quot;unthinkable disasters&quot; considering he took the medical malpractice money awarded by a jury to rehabilitate his wife to, instead, have her starved to death. But, I&#039;m pretty sure that&#039;s not what PEOPLE had in mind. 

As for the &quot;astonishing revelations&quot; â€” I&#039;d say if Michael came clean about what really happened that night 15 years ago while he waited a full 70 minutes to call 911 after his perfectly healthy wife collapsed, then he&#039;d fit that category. 

Which only leaves the &quot;remarkable human spirit&quot; department for Mr. Schiavo. Let&#039;s see. I guess PEOPLE believes it&#039;s a &quot;remarkable&quot; quality of the human spirit when a married man lives with another woman while pledging love to the wife he&#039;s trying to put down like a wounded animal. 

Interestingly, a full half of the 167-word article promoted his new book. QUESTION: Is PEOPLE owned by, or have a financial interest in, Michael&#039;s publisher? That might be a gem to disclose since this flotsum reads like a shameless plug for his book.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody expects PEOPLE to be offering &#8220;fair and balanced&#8221; articles. Nor do we expect them to write above a third-grade level. Even so, I was equally stunned to see a giant two-page spread featuring the freshly quaffed Michael Schiavo SITTING against Terri&#8217;s headstone (didn&#8217;t ANYBODY teach the man that it is irreverent to sit, stand, walk, jump, or sleep on a headstone?) followed by a brief &#8220;article.&#8221; The caption for this section said:</p>
<p>&#8220;NEWSMAKERS OF THE YEAR: Unthinkable disasters, astonishing revelations, and remarkable human spirit. Here are the people who made 2005 memorable.&#8221;</p>
<p>I guess you could argue that Michael Schiavo falls into the category of &#8220;unthinkable disasters&#8221; considering he took the medical malpractice money awarded by a jury to rehabilitate his wife to, instead, have her starved to death. But, I&#8217;m pretty sure that&#8217;s not what PEOPLE had in mind. </p>
<p>As for the &#8220;astonishing revelations&#8221; â€” I&#8217;d say if Michael came clean about what really happened that night 15 years ago while he waited a full 70 minutes to call 911 after his perfectly healthy wife collapsed, then he&#8217;d fit that category. </p>
<p>Which only leaves the &#8220;remarkable human spirit&#8221; department for Mr. Schiavo. Let&#8217;s see. I guess PEOPLE believes it&#8217;s a &#8220;remarkable&#8221; quality of the human spirit when a married man lives with another woman while pledging love to the wife he&#8217;s trying to put down like a wounded animal. </p>
<p>Interestingly, a full half of the 167-word article promoted his new book. QUESTION: Is PEOPLE owned by, or have a financial interest in, Michael&#8217;s publisher? That might be a gem to disclose since this flotsum reads like a shameless plug for his book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Common Sense Runs Wild</title>
		<link>http://amomandherblog.com/newsmakers-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-2536</link>
		<dc:creator>Common Sense Runs Wild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 04:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amomandherblog.com/?p=427#comment-2536</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;IT&#039;S A HOLIDAY COTILLION&lt;/strong&gt;

Fashionably late the ladies of The Cotillion are happy to invite you to our holiday block party. The first stop is at sisu where Sissy presents A Microcosm Of America At Its Best. &quot;We often talk about how our policies...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>IT&#8217;S A HOLIDAY COTILLION</strong></p>
<p>Fashionably late the ladies of The Cotillion are happy to invite you to our holiday block party. The first stop is at sisu where Sissy presents A Microcosm Of America At Its Best. &#8220;We often talk about how our policies&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valerie</title>
		<link>http://amomandherblog.com/newsmakers-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-2532</link>
		<dc:creator>Valerie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amomandherblog.com/?p=427#comment-2532</guid>
		<description>To think that he is going to profit (YET AGAIN) from telling &quot;his&quot; story speaks volumes about his &quot;character&quot;.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To think that he is going to profit (YET AGAIN) from telling &#8220;his&#8221; story speaks volumes about his &#8220;character&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacy</title>
		<link>http://amomandherblog.com/newsmakers-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-2531</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2005 20:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amomandherblog.com/?p=427#comment-2531</guid>
		<description>I find it ironic that Terri&#039;s life was of no value to those on the left, but Tookie Williams&#039; was.  Murder the innocent, save the guilty.

Despite whatever anyone may believe about Terri&#039;s condition, starving her to death was inhumane.  People are imprisoned for starving their pets.  All the time here we see people charged with animal cruelty for not feeding their horses.

Frickin&#039; A!!  Better go before I curse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it ironic that Terri&#8217;s life was of no value to those on the left, but Tookie Williams&#8217; was.  Murder the innocent, save the guilty.</p>
<p>Despite whatever anyone may believe about Terri&#8217;s condition, starving her to death was inhumane.  People are imprisoned for starving their pets.  All the time here we see people charged with animal cruelty for not feeding their horses.</p>
<p>Frickin&#8217; A!!  Better go before I curse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darleen</title>
		<link>http://amomandherblog.com/newsmakers-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-2530</link>
		<dc:creator>Darleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amomandherblog.com/?p=427#comment-2530</guid>
		<description>The most salient point of the whole Schiavo affair is about how the LAW should approach these life and death issues. Terri was not on extraordinarly life support. She was only being cared for as one would any fully dependent individual - bathed, talked to, fed, hydrated, etc. Even the original malpractice case, the award was based on what was considered would be her normative lifespan in her dependent state. 

Terri left no written instructions. Indeed, the testimony on Terri&#039;s purported verbal wishes was, IMHO, exceedingly thin (and pretty self-serving by Michael). Since Terri was NOT on life support and left NO written instructions, the argument basically about should the law take a DEATH default or a LIFE default?

In other words, should Terri&#039;s custody, absent Terri&#039;s own unequivocal instructions, go to those that are willing to care for her until natural death occurs or go to someone that wants to put her down?

This became an alarming matter to people who have family members who are severely disabled, since it comes startling close to open euthanasia. Couple that with Michael&#039;s attorney and his major medical&quot; expert witness&quot; ARE open advocates of euthanizing the &quot;inconvenient&quot; and that Michael had already moved on with his life, taking a mistress and having children with her, and you have a situation in which Michael&#039;s motive appear less than sterling and his subsequent behavior (such as putting Terri&#039;s death date on her tombstone as the day she went into a coma, and his media whoring above) reinforces and to some extent substantiates the initial appearance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most salient point of the whole Schiavo affair is about how the LAW should approach these life and death issues. Terri was not on extraordinarly life support. She was only being cared for as one would any fully dependent individual &#8211; bathed, talked to, fed, hydrated, etc. Even the original malpractice case, the award was based on what was considered would be her normative lifespan in her dependent state. </p>
<p>Terri left no written instructions. Indeed, the testimony on Terri&#8217;s purported verbal wishes was, IMHO, exceedingly thin (and pretty self-serving by Michael). Since Terri was NOT on life support and left NO written instructions, the argument basically about should the law take a DEATH default or a LIFE default?</p>
<p>In other words, should Terri&#8217;s custody, absent Terri&#8217;s own unequivocal instructions, go to those that are willing to care for her until natural death occurs or go to someone that wants to put her down?</p>
<p>This became an alarming matter to people who have family members who are severely disabled, since it comes startling close to open euthanasia. Couple that with Michael&#8217;s attorney and his major medical&#8221; expert witness&#8221; ARE open advocates of euthanizing the &#8220;inconvenient&#8221; and that Michael had already moved on with his life, taking a mistress and having children with her, and you have a situation in which Michael&#8217;s motive appear less than sterling and his subsequent behavior (such as putting Terri&#8217;s death date on her tombstone as the day she went into a coma, and his media whoring above) reinforces and to some extent substantiates the initial appearance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Common Sense Runs Wild</title>
		<link>http://amomandherblog.com/newsmakers-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-2529</link>
		<dc:creator>Common Sense Runs Wild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amomandherblog.com/?p=427#comment-2529</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;MICHAEL SCHIAVO ONE OF PEOPLE&#039;S NEWSMAKERS OF THE YEAR&lt;/strong&gt;

According to Tammy at A Mom and Her Blog People magazine has proclaimed Michael Schiavo one of the &quot;Newsmakers of the Year&quot;. It begins by noting Michael Schiavoâ€™s life has settled down since doctors removed the feeding tube from his...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>MICHAEL SCHIAVO ONE OF PEOPLE&#8217;S NEWSMAKERS OF THE YEAR</strong></p>
<p>According to Tammy at A Mom and Her Blog People magazine has proclaimed Michael Schiavo one of the &#8220;Newsmakers of the Year&#8221;. It begins by noting Michael Schiavoâ€™s life has settled down since doctors removed the feeding tube from his&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mongakim</title>
		<link>http://amomandherblog.com/newsmakers-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-2528</link>
		<dc:creator>Mongakim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amomandherblog.com/?p=427#comment-2528</guid>
		<description>The whole damn thing is just sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole damn thing is just sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janette</title>
		<link>http://amomandherblog.com/newsmakers-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-2527</link>
		<dc:creator>Janette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2005 17:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amomandherblog.com/?p=427#comment-2527</guid>
		<description>Frankly the use of the word &quot;vegetable&quot; in reference to a living human being disgusts me. That some of you use it so glibly shows an enormous disrespect for life.

If any of you would like to actually educate yourselves on the facts surrounding Terri&#039;s case I suggest you start at this link and then click around a little more. http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2005/02/terri_schiavo_i.php 

As you&#039;ll see in the video and from the testimony Terri wasn&#039;t comatose or un responsive. Her only means of &quot;life support&quot; was a feeding tube. She was NOT on a &quot;life support&quot; machine. Her heart and lungs worked just fine. 

Michael Schiavo murdered his severely disabled wife by starving her to death.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly the use of the word &#8220;vegetable&#8221; in reference to a living human being disgusts me. That some of you use it so glibly shows an enormous disrespect for life.</p>
<p>If any of you would like to actually educate yourselves on the facts surrounding Terri&#8217;s case I suggest you start at this link and then click around a little more. <a href="http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2005/02/terri_schiavo_i.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2005/02/terri_schiavo_i.php</a> </p>
<p>As you&#8217;ll see in the video and from the testimony Terri wasn&#8217;t comatose or un responsive. Her only means of &#8220;life support&#8221; was a feeding tube. She was NOT on a &#8220;life support&#8221; machine. Her heart and lungs worked just fine. </p>
<p>Michael Schiavo murdered his severely disabled wife by starving her to death.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tammy</title>
		<link>http://amomandherblog.com/newsmakers-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-2526</link>
		<dc:creator>Tammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amomandherblog.com/?p=427#comment-2526</guid>
		<description>But is feeding a person a form of life support, or a way of keeping a person artificially alive?  I just don&#039;t see it that way.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But is feeding a person a form of life support, or a way of keeping a person artificially alive?  I just don&#8217;t see it that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean-Luc Picard</title>
		<link>http://amomandherblog.com/newsmakers-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-2524</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean-Luc Picard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amomandherblog.com/?p=427#comment-2524</guid>
		<description>Writing a book never seems the right thing to do, although keeping a person alive artificially when they are hopelessly brain damaged isn&#039;t, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Writing a book never seems the right thing to do, although keeping a person alive artificially when they are hopelessly brain damaged isn&#8217;t, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raindrop Fairy</title>
		<link>http://amomandherblog.com/newsmakers-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-2523</link>
		<dc:creator>Raindrop Fairy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amomandherblog.com/?p=427#comment-2523</guid>
		<description>Hello, Michele sent me. 

It&#039;s a difficult task to decide wheather to keep someone a live or &quot;pull the plug&quot;. I would like to say I wouldn&#039;t pull the plug, but I won&#039;t know untill I&#039;m in that position. It&#039;s hard to imagine before you are right in the middle of it. 

Regarding the book, I think that&#039;s strange. If he really want to write a book, he should wait. It&#039;s too soon. Plus he should donate the money or at least some of it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, Michele sent me. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a difficult task to decide wheather to keep someone a live or &#8220;pull the plug&#8221;. I would like to say I wouldn&#8217;t pull the plug, but I won&#8217;t know untill I&#8217;m in that position. It&#8217;s hard to imagine before you are right in the middle of it. </p>
<p>Regarding the book, I think that&#8217;s strange. If he really want to write a book, he should wait. It&#8217;s too soon. Plus he should donate the money or at least some of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Courtney</title>
		<link>http://amomandherblog.com/newsmakers-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-2522</link>
		<dc:creator>Courtney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amomandherblog.com/?p=427#comment-2522</guid>
		<description>We&#039;re going to disagree strongly on this issue, so rather than start a fight with a total stranger, I&#039;ll just say Merry Christmas, and be on my way.
Michele sent me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re going to disagree strongly on this issue, so rather than start a fight with a total stranger, I&#8217;ll just say Merry Christmas, and be on my way.<br />
Michele sent me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

